Members Login
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: At Sword's Point: Musings


Status: Offline
Posts: 9
RE: At Sword's Point: Musings

Last week I posed the question as to when the last known duel with sharp epees was fought. The answer is 1967.

That fencing is growing in Texas is not up for serious debate. In the major cities like Houston, Dallas, Forth Worth, Austin and San Antonio, the number of clubs continues to grow and membership in the established clubs is robust.

The real news is the growth of fencing in smaller communities, the small cities and mid-sized towns. Amarillo, Lubbock, Midland, El Paso, McAllen, Tyler, Lake Jackson, Round Rock, Corpus Christi, all have at least one fencing club. So, as fencing looks forward to healthy future seasons, we might take a moment to look back at its... more colorful past.

The first men in what is now the Lone Star State to have a background in fencing looked upon it as a highly practical skill. In San Antonio, Nacogdoches and La Bahia, soldiers of the Spanish Crown counted swordsmanship along with their skills with firearms and horses as absolutely necessary for survival. Along the coast, in places like Galveston Bay and Matagorda Bay, shadier individuals who styled themselves as privateers, and whom the less kind called pirates, were also practiced in the practical applications of sharpened steel.

Throughout the 19th Century one filibustering expedition after another attempted to rip Texas away from the Spanish King. Some did so in the name of Mexican Independence, others in the name of a separate republic in Texas. Suffice that, from 1801, when Spanish soldiers routed Philip Nolan's expedition until the Battle of San Jacinto in 1836, armed conflict frequently reared its head. This was the era of the single shot pistol and musket. Combatants might have time to get off only one or two volleys before both sides closed. At that point knives, swords, bayonets and tomahawks were the rule.

At the same time, while a province of Mexico, Texas had been opened up to Anglo colonists, many from the American South. They brought with them their own peculiar institutions: slavery (which the Mexican government banned by law) and the duel (which the Mexicans could understand as they had their own similar customs).

As in the rest of North America, duels with firearms were vastly more common, still, the sword duel was not unknown. While Texas could never compete with its neighbor, Louisiana, in sheer numbers, a partial list of interesting sword duels within the boundaries of modern Texas would include:

San Antonio, 1815 between Don Juan Zambrono and Lt. Jose Yanez;

Galveston, 1836 between Col. James Milroy and Capt. William R. Hays;

San Antonio, 1844 between two groups of four men each (de Lominie, Souriau, Pavie, and Villemessant) (Corcoran, Twigg, McDowell and Salceda);

Sometime before 1855 between Mark F. Skerritt and a French fencing master;

1875 between L. E. Edwards of Austin and George Bondies of Galveston (actually fought in Louisiana to avoid Texas laws against dueling).

Later we will look at how fencing moved from the practical skill of the duelist to a modern, competitive sport.

There were two major tournaments last weekend. At the 11th anniversary SabreCave competition, Joseph Pipkin, fencing unattached, captured first place in senior mixed sabre. Arden Youngblood of the Dallas Fencers Club won first place in the senior women's sabre event.

At the 34th annual Bobcat Open, the always formidable Robert Reed of the Alamo Fencing Academy took first place in mixed epee. The first place in mixed foil went to Dowoong Ham of the Austin Fencers Club, a man easily twice the age of many of his opponents. Davis Jno-Finn of the Fencing Club at the University of Houston won the mixed sabre event. The gold in women's epee went to Anna Tolley of Alamo Fencing Academy. Women's foil gold fell to Alisa Chernomashentsev from Florida.

Next weekend there is a small youth epee tournament in Houston, but most of the major competitors will be stepping just across the state line to Shreveport for the Rose Condon Memorial tournament.



Status: Offline
Posts: 9
The Point of Truth

There are three weapons in modern, competitive fencing: foil, sabre and epee. The first two have already been covered so we now turn to every crossword puzzle fiend's favorite fencing weapon, the epee.

At first blush, the epee seems the simplest of the three weapons. It may score only with the tip like foil, but all similarities end there. First of all, forget that blather about "valid target" from foil (torso only) and sabre (everything above the hips). It epee, the entire body is valid target: head, toes, knees, pinkies.

Epee also dispenses with conventions of "right-of-way." If two epeeistes attack at the same time and both land a touch, the score is now tied at 1-1. It is said that foil teaches us how a duel should be fought and the epee teaches us how it would be fought.

In the 1800s smallswords and colichemardes were the early duelling sword of choice in France, England and America. Both weapons had a trifoil cross-section (thus no edge) and a devasting point. Duelling began to change, however. Men stopped wearing swords as a matter of civilian dress. At the same time, a movement began that allowed for duels "to first blood" to satisfy matters of personal honor.

Two men would agree to meet and fight until either one bled. At that point they had proved their honor. The matter was settled and both could adjourn for a pleasant breakfast together.

Because swords were no longer worn as a matter of dress, the guard got larger, to protect the hand. Especially important since that "first blood" movement took hold. The closest part of my opponent to me is the hand holding his sword. There is my first target.

Thus, the duelling sword (or epee... simply French for "sword") was born. The large guard covered the hand. The trifoil cross-section allowed more metal (and, thus, weight) to be removed without reducing strength or flexibility.

Sorry, that stuff about "blood-grooves" is a myth. It's all engineering and metallurgy.

At the first Modern Olympic Games in Athens in 1896, only the foil and sabre were used. In 1896 the epee was not considered a "sporting weapon." Epees were still being used for duels. The epee was not for sport. It was a serious weapon for "frank encounters." As a point of fact, even in America, once the epee joined the ranks of the other two competitive weapons, from the 1900s to the 1930s, it was more often called the "duelling sword" than the "epee."

Even now we have a saying in fencing. "Sabre is theatre. Foil is art. Epee is truth."

While foil is still the weapon most fencers learn first, in Texas, the epee is so popular that it is not uncommon for epee events to pull more competitors than foil. At the 2008 Olympics in Beijing, the one Texan on the US Olympic fencing team fenced... yes, epee.

Here is a trivia point I will answer in my next post. When was the last duel with epees fought?


This weekend saw two tournaments in the Lone Star State. In Katy, just west of Houston, there was a small tournament held by the Katy Blades fencing club, In Remembrance of Pedersen. The reference, the Katy Blades fencer Trevor Pedersen does not mean he died, just that he is leaving to go off to college. It drew a respectable crowd of local fencers from around the Houston area.

The big tournament, however, was farther north. Baylor University hosted their annual Alvin Adelman Memorial Tournament. As the results link shows, it drew a collection of powerhouse fencers from: Dallas; Forth Worth; Houston; San Antonio; Austin; San Marcos; Round Rock; College Station; Oklahoma City; Florida; Kentucky; and, Fayetteville, Arkansas.

This next weekend there are three tournaments in Texas. There is a youth epee tournament in San Antonio hosted by the Alamo Fencing Academy. For sabreurs (sabre-fencers), the focus of the weekend will be the suburb of North Richland Hills near Fort Worth, where the 19th anniversary SabreCave tournament will be held.

The really big event, however, will be at Texas State University in San Marcos where they will hold the 34th annual Bobcat Open. This is the longest, continuously held tournament in the state.



Status: Offline
Posts: 9
At Sword's Point: Musings

Children & Swords

In the last post, I noted that the 3-day Labor Day weekend would include exactly one fencing tournament in Texas, a Super Youth Circuit (SYC) in Houston. Some 300 fencers participated. They came from Orange County, California and San Francisco and Portland Oregon. They came from Long Island and New Jersey and Jacksonville, Florida. They came from Canada, Chicago, and Denver.

They had three things in common. They were fencers. They were competitive athletes. They were between 8 and 14 years of age.

Last time I also mentioned sabre competitions and how fast they were.

Here are clips of the Youth-10 & Under men's sabre gold medal bout (broken into 2 parts).

People sometimes argue with me and tell me they think our students should not take up fencing in high school. I agree. They should get their first instruction in the elementary grades.

The SYC in Houston, Texas was the only one of the eight SYC's sanctioned by the United States Fencing Association (USFA) for the season that runs from August 2009 to July 2010 that would not be (more or less) an East Coast or West Coast event.

As the Dallas Morning News recently observed, "Each fall, many kids start the school year dejected about being rejected for the too-few spots on school sports teams. And that doesn't include the many who don't try out because they've been told they're too short for basketball or not big or broad enough for football or haven't been playing select volleyball since they were 5."

More introverted (but no less able) students shy away from team sports where the attention, adulation and (don't even try to to deny this) money focus on the one or two extroverted, accomplished superstars.

Others are also simply more individual-oriented than team-oriented.

Then, there are the smart students...

Fencing probably attracts a significantly and disproportionately higher percentage of honors students among it total competitive population than any other sport.

It does have drawbacks, however. Public school traditionally have a difficult time getting a handle on individual sports as opposed to team sports. For all of our blather about individual rights, Americans mostly want to know what "team" you're on. Football, basketball, baseball, hockey, soccer... They are about teams and they are about chasing balls.

Fencing is personal and lonely. On the piste (fencing strip) there is only you and your opponent and the referee. Your victories are yours and yours alone, but so are your defeats.

Additionally, while it is an athletic endeavour, it is also a mental game. You seek to decieve your opponent and lead them astray, in about half a second. You seek to divine you adversary's intent (attack or merely a feint) in the 1/5 of a second you have to decide and act. It is a martial art but it is also chess at 300 mph.

It is an anachronism in a world chasing instant fame, groupies and the almighty dollar.

Yet every year, more and more young people pick up a foil, an epee, a sabre. A decade and a half ago the USFA boasted but 10,000 dues-paying members of all ages. Today the number is closer to 25,000-30,000 (and that does not even take into account the purely "recreational fencers" or classical fencers, who do not compete in USFA-sanctioned events and, thus, do not join).

The jokes about pirates, swashbucklers, Zorro and the Three Musketeers are all very cute, trite and tired. Fencing, however, is a serious sport... and it is growing.

NEXT WEEKEND: We have two tournaments in Texas.

Baylor University in Waco holds their annual Adelman Memorial Tournament on Saturday, September 12. This is a 3-weapon tournament.

On Saturday & Sunday of the same weekend, the Katy Blades (based in Katy Mills Mall, Katy, TX) holds a mostly epee tournament in honor of one of the high schoolers who is about to move away to college

-- Edited by schlager7 on Wednesday 9th of September 2009 09:15:58 AM



Status: Offline
Posts: 9

The Cutting Edge

Now for sabre.

Sabre is the only one of the three modern fencing weapons that allows the fencer to score with the edge as well as the point. It makes sabre somewhat less linear, more multi-dimensional.

Like foil, sabre has a restricted area that is considered valid target, but it is less restricted than foil. In foil, only the torso is considered valid target. In sabre, everything above the forward curves of the pelvic bone is valid target: belly, chest, back, arms, head.

Because of this expanded valid target area, and the fact that even simple contact by any part of the blade on that target is seen as a "hit," sabre becomes a very fast game. Like foil, sabre employs conventions of "right-of-way" or "priority."

One fencer attacks. Their opponent must either avoid the touch or parry it (with an IMMEDIATE riposte), As with foil, once the first fencer attacks, if their attack is not parried and lands on valid target, only they are awarded a touch, even if their adversary also hit them. If attacked, you must defend or successfully evade. As with foil, sabre does not reward suicide.

Because of the large amount of valid target and the ease with which an attack may be subtly altered (a verticle stroke that appears to be a cut to the head can easily shift in mid-extention to a lateral cut to the flank), sabre can be more difficult to parry. Thus we see many actions where the defender retreats just out of range then, as the attacker's cut/swing misses, leaps forward to deliver an attack of their own. All in seconds... or less.

Sabre is a very, very fast game. It is also, at the higher skill levels a very nuanced game. The number of people qualified to referee sabre is much smaller than with either foil or epee.

Even at the elite level of Olympians the unexpected can happen.

THIS WEEKEND: Sabre was the focus of this weekend's only fencing tournament in Texas, the End of Summer Sabre tournament. It was held by the Fencing Institute of Texas in Farmer's Branch, a suburban city on the northern edge of Fort Worth. Being early in the fencing year, and focusing on the weapon with the fewest adherants, it was a small affair, drawing a couple of competitors from Houston and one from Tulsa, but otherwise representing the "usual suspects" for sabre in the Dallas-Ft. Worth region. Kate Sierra, who I thought was the strongest of the competitors who had pre-registered as of last Sunday, came in second, being defeated by her clubmate Omair Ahmad (both belong to the Cutting Edge Fencing Club of Ft. Worth).

NEXT WEEKEND: Again, we have only one tournament in Texas, but WHAT a tournament. The Bayou City Fencing Academy, based in Houston is playing host to one of the 8 Super Youth Circuit tournaments in the US this season. In a SYC tournament competitions are held men's foil, women's foil, men's epee, women's epee, men's sabre, and women's sabre... but each of those six events I described is actually three (broken into Youth-14 & Under, Youth-12 & Under, and Youth-10 & Under). So we have Youth-14 & Under Men's Epee, as well as Youth-10 & Under Women's Sabre... and everything in between.

To get an idea of the scope follow the link to the SYC pre-registration for this event. Place your cursor on the abbreviation for the fencer's club and get a feel for the diversity of locales these youngster are flying in from to fence.



Status: Offline
Posts: 9


LAST WEEKEND: We had two tournaments this last weekend. In Farmer's Branch near Ft. Worth, the Fencing Institute of Texas hosted their "End of Summer Foil" Tournament. Unfortunately it was not a diverse event in terms of affiliation. Most of the competitors, and all of the winners, came from FIT.

First place in the "Youth-10 & Under Mixed Foil" competition went to Brycen Rushing. Douglas Lovelace won the gold in the "Youth-12 & Under Mixed Foil" event. The "Senior Mixed Foil" event had the real upset. The heavily favored Enzo Castellani did not participate. More interestingly, Longda Yin, who carried a B2009 classification beat the formidable Zain Shaito (A2009) for the gold medal. This elevated Yin to an A2009.

On the far southeast side of Houston, the Clear Lake Fencing Club's 11th annual Fete de Lune veterans' (age 40+) tournament was held August 22. Diane Kallus from the Texas Hill Country was an early favorite to capture the best overall prize in women's events. Diane, however, was held back by having to fence through a summer cold. She wone the Women's Epee event, but Cheryl Laird of Salle Mauro in Bellaire, TX won Women's Sabre and Women's Foil. By also tieing for 3rd place in Women's Epee she secured the Women's 3-Weapon prize (a Wedgewood pin on a string of pearls).

The field was far more spread out in the mixed events. Mixed Foil was completely dominated by Emilio Ybarra, representing San Antonio's Texas Fencing Academy. Ybarra took the gold in the final by defeating Don Cravey from the host club. In Mixed Sabre, August Skopik of the Katy Blades in Katy, TX won the gold by defeating Cravey in the final for that event. Alexander Popovici of the Alliance Fencing Academy in The Woodlands secured the Mixed Epee gold by defeating Sam Gilchrist of the Halberstadt Fencing Club in San Francisco.

Interestingly, while Ybarra and Skopik were both contending for the 3-Weapon prize, they lost their chance for it by doing far less well in the other events they fenced. Instead Don Cravey won the best overall in all 3 weapons by finishing 2nd in both foil and sabre and 5th in epee, and gaining the prize by accumulated points. The prize was a custom modified epee with a grip made from antler and a guard of sterling silver over polished copper, with sterling cameo of Greco-Roman figures.

NEXT WEEKEND: We have a slow fencing weekend in Texas upcoming with only the "End of Summer Sabre" tournament by the Fencer's Institute of Texas scheduled in Farmer's Branch. A glance at those who are preregistered as of this writing seems to show Kate Sierra of the Cutting Edge Fencing Club in Ft. Worth to be the favorite in the Senior event. Check by next week for the results

Fete de Lune: Mixed Foil Final



Status: Offline
Posts: 9
For a Lifetime

As the new fencing year begins chugging forward we come into the weekend of August 22nd with offerings in the DFW Metroplex and the Houston/Galveston area.

To the north, the Fencing Institute of Texas, affectionately dubbed "FIT," is hosting their "End of Summer Foil" tournament. You may recall in my previous post I mentioned that foil is a weapon traditionally taught to beginners. I neglected to mention that it is also the discipline that many devote their lives to mastering.

The "End of Summer Foil" consists of two events.

One is for fencers age 12 and UNDER.

One is your basic Senior (age 13 & up) Mixed (both men and women in the same event) Foil. So far 25 fencers have pre-registered for that event. While the number may seem rather small, some of the Lone Star State's best foilists are already on board. Leading the pack is Enzo Castellani, who has seen more than one gold medal at the national level. Just as intimidating are the sisters Mai and Mona Shaito. As one colleague once quipped, the Shaito Family is "all over foil." Watch for all three of these names to appear in the future.

Across the state, the Clear Lake Fencing Club, based near the Johnson Space Center, is hosting their 11th annual Fete de Lune "veterans' tournament." This is not a reference to military service, but to age. All of the competitors are 40 years old and OLDER... some much OLDER. This event has competitions in all three weapons (foil, epee, and sabre).

While the women's events are still a bit small as far as pre-registrants go, it is not going too far out on a limb to predict that Diane Kallus from the Texas Hill Country will sweep all three women's events.

The mixed events are a trickier game. Reviewing the pre-registrants, there are four to focus on. The local favorite is Don Cravey, an aerospace engineer working at the Space Center. He is by far the host club's major threat in all three weapons.

Another local concern is August Skopik of Katy. Both Cravey and Skopik have won the Grand 3-Weapon Prize in the past.

Ray Sexton, however, must be taken into consideration. Not only is has he competed on an International level in his age group, he once travelled to Budapest and defeated the locals in sabre (Young boys in Hungary take to sabre fencing like American kids take to Little League Baseball). I should add that Ray is Diane Kallus' significant other. They are the double-threat from the Hill Country.

The real concern, however, may be Curtis Hardy of the San Antonio area. He just "aged up" into veterans events awhile back and took the 3-Weapon Grand Prize last year.

This time next week, we will know.



Status: Offline
Posts: 9
RE: At Sword's Point: Musings

Foiling Around

The fencing year in this region has begun and by next week the preliminary competition schedule will be determined, and posted. It seems a good time to discuss a bit about fencing and the traditional "first weapon" taught to a beginning fencer.

Nine times out of ten, if you are talking with someone and they mention that they "used to fence" or "took fencing in college" (and there really are quite a lot of them out there), what they mean is that they took lessons in FOIL fencing.

Modern Olympic fencing has three different disciplines, or "weapons": foil, epee and sabre. In EPEE, while all touches must be scored with the tip, the entire body is target, literally from head to toe. It also does not have those bothersome rules of right-of-way. SABRE does have rules of right-of-way, and there is less valid target than epee: basically everything from the hips up is fair game. What sabre has going for it is that you can score with the tip or the edge.

Foil is a tougher nut. It has the tiniest target, basically the torso. You hit your adversary's head, arms or legs and the referee may call "halt!" but no points are awarded. Even then the referee won't even call a halt if you just hit your opponent with the edge or side of the foil. You are only awarded a point if you land a touch on your opponent's valid target (torso) with the tip of your foil...

and maybe not even then.

You will recall I said something about RIGHT-OF-WAY.

The foil was created in the late 1600s/early 1700s as a training tool for those who might expect to find themselves in a duel with the primary dueling weapon of that age in England, France and their colonies: the smallsword.

Barely 30-32 inches long, the smallsword had no edge (in fact, the blade's cross-section was a trifoil) but a needle-sharp point. If you impaled your opponent's thigh or arm, it would hurt him, but he could still kill you.

Therefore, foilists were taught to target the torso, infliciting the kind of injury that would, at least, give your adversary pause.

As to right-of-way, in a tournament or classroom situation, it works like this. Two fencers are en garde, facing each other. Inevitably, one attacks. The attack is defined as the INITIAL offensive action, caused by extending the point at your opponent and threatening valid target. If my opponent does exactly that, and my response is to do the same, and we both hit on valid target... only my opponent gets a point.


My opponent attacked. A perfectly reasonable thing. I, on the other hand, did not defend myself. I threw myself on their point while trying to hit them. In essence, I just committed suicide.

In foil, we do NOT award points for suicide. Instead, once my opponent attacks, I have two options (well, more, but for now...)

If I counter-attack (which is what I did in the paragraph above), I can win a point ONLY if: 1.) I land my tip on their valid target; and, 2.) they completely MISS me.

My other option, once they launch an attack is to PARRY their attack (that is, deflect their blade with my own blade) and launch an IMMEDIATE "Riposte" (an offensive act after parrying their attack).

Foil was created to teach an 18th Century gentleman what to do in oder to get home once he had begun a duel. Thanks to two hundred years of adapting it into a sport, it can also be one of the fastest, most difficult, most athletic and most intellectual of sports.

It is also how we instruct beginners: learn the hard stuff first.



Status: Offline
Posts: 9

It Begins

It is early August and the new fencing year has begun. You will notice I did not say "fencing season." The closest thing fencing has to off-season, is a snippet of time from (more or less) mid-July to mid-August... and that is not absolute.

Being an indoor sport allows fencing to be a year-round endeavour. That is only one of the differences between fencing and so many of the more popular sports: baseball; basketball; football; soccer; bowling and tennis, among others.

Fencing, you see, does not use a "ball." It uses, for want of a better word, swords. Actually, fencers rarely call their sporting implements "swords." For the most part, we call them "weapons." There are three weapons used: the foil, the epee and the sabre, but more on that next time.

Although they do not have pointed tips or sharp edges and could not cut cheese, we call them "weapons." It's just our term. It's tradition. It is also one reason why your typical public school is stark staring terrified of allowing fencing onto their campus. Weapons. Danger. Death. Fear.

As so many such agencies charged with our welfare are apt to do, the schools make rulings about fencing while being wholly ignorant of any specifics of the sport. It is to be expected, though. We use "weapons." What else is there to know?

When in doubt, ban it.

Another difference between fencing and the more popular school sports, is that it is an individual effort. The fencer is called to the "strip" or "piste" (fencing's field of play is an area 14 meters long and 1.5 to 2 meters wide) and faces their opponent. Save for the referee (formerly called the director), there is only the two fencers.

They are alone.

They may each have a coach in their corner and friends and family to cheer them on, but on strip it is only the fencer and his or her opponent.

While there are certain types of competition called "team fencing," they are really more of a relay. So even in the team events, it comes down to one fencer versus one fencer.

This really plays havoc with much of the basic high school PE coach's repetoire on team work and performing as a team/group/machine. Fencing is an individual effort, pure and simple.

Fencing, in spite of its almost complete absence in sports news is very much alive, well and, indeed, thriving. In fact, fencing is active enough throughout the state of Texas that it is a rare weekend that has NO fencing competitions.

Over the next few posts I hope to introduce those of you curious enough to keep reading to catch a glimpse of Texas' and America's best-kept athletic secret. There will be current events, snippets of history, anecdotes and foibles. I hope you will keep reading.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to

Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard